| |
From independence to date, frequent episodes
of conflict have left Uganda bedeviled with a legacy of mass
trauma. In the course of these conflicts numerous people
have either witnessed or been involved in grotesque violence,
consequently affecting their abilities to cope or to adapt
normally in society. All too often, the consequences of these
stresses have left individuals and entire societies
dysfunctional, and in many instances, it leaves communities
divided along different moralities and ways of viewing the
world.
Nowhere else is this problem as acute as in northern
Uganda, which has been engulfed by a protracted conflict for
over two decades resulting in the mass displacement of nearly
two million people. In the context of the encampment, the
initial psychological impact of being uprooted - something
which affects most Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) - has
been compounded by the daily challenge of living with the
psychological impacts of the loss of social and cultural
identities, prolonged exposure to violence, and inadequate or
nearly absent response mechanisms. As the Juba peace talks
raise widespread hope that the conflict is coming to an end,
one important question now facing individuals and communities
in this region is whether to forget their experiences or to
remember them. At present, there is little clarity on how to
remember, forget or cope.
In addressing the consequences of cumulative, prolonged and
unhealed traumatic stresses, many initiatives are needed from
individuals, researchers, traditional authorities, civil
society organisations, humanitarian bodies and the Government.
A range of response mechanisms are often fronted to deal with
the repercussions of mental health issues. One major dilemma
is how to reconcile western and individualised models with
traditional/communal response mechanisms.
This debate, just like the debate among legal scholars
which has pitted proponents of retributive justice against
adherents of restorative justice, is ongoing in northern
Uganda. Individualised models, for example, affect the way
people live, their cultural norms and practices, and their
shared beliefs. On the other hand, issues of confidentiality,
whether in the legal arena or in the communities, are real for
many individuals and therefore demand individualized
responses.
Given the above, psychosocial issues in conflict areas
become one of the basic indispensable areas for investigation,
advocacy and therapeutic interventions. This is in response to
the alarming paradoxical psychosocial dilemma, and its
crippling impact to healing, reconciliation, re-integration,
justice, and the attainment of sustainable peace in Uganda in
this transitional era.
This component of the Project will explore some of the
above issues through a series of investigations in different
segments of the community including ex-combatants, formerly
abducted people, and the general population. In close
collaboration with the legal research, it aims to make
recommendations about how the wide range of psycho-social
issues affecting northern Uganda could best be addressed
through the development and implementation of appropriate
transitional justice responses.
|